SLOHM

SLOHM Game Theory#

The SLOHM protocol's mechanics create a game-theoretic environment where the optimal strategy for individual participants also produces the best collective outcome. This dynamic, known as (₿,₿), describes the cooperative equilibrium where participants bond and stake to maximize returns while strengthening the protocol for everyone.

The (₿,₿) Framework#

(₿,₿) is SLOHM's adaptation of OlympusDAO's (3,3) game theory for Bitcoin L1. It describes a situation where every participant chooses to stake their SLOHM. When this cooperative equilibrium holds:

The (₿,₿) outcome is not enforced by the protocol. It emerges naturally because the protocol's mechanics make cooperation the most profitable individual choice.

Participant Actions#

Every SLOHM holder faces three primary choices:

Stake#

The participant holds and stakes SLOHM to earn rebase rewards. This is a neutral action that still supports protocol stability by reducing circulating supply.

Bond#

The participant bonds assets into the treasury. It strengthens the treasury and increases the reserve floor.

Sell#

The participant sells SLOHM on the open market. This creates sell pressure and reduces the staking base. However, selling below the reserve floor creates a buying opportunity for others, and selling above it accelerates bonding demand. The protocol's arbitrage dynamics naturally absorb selling pressure.

Payoff Dynamics#

The returns for each strategy depend on what other participants choose:

StakeBondSell
Stake(₿,₿)(1,₿)(-1,1)
Bond(₿,1)(1,1)(-1,1)
Sell(1,-1)(1,-1)(-₿,-₿)

The key insight: the whole idea behind (₿,₿) is that staying for the long term is a choice that results in the highest benefit for everyone. If others cooperate, you benefit from a growing treasury. If others sell, you acquire SLOHM at a discount while the protocol's self-correcting mechanics restore equilibrium.

Why Cooperation Dominates#

Several protocol features make the cooperative (₿,₿) strategy self-reinforcing:

Self-Correcting Dynamics#

The protocol does not require all participants to cooperate at all times. When some participants defect (sell), the system self-corrects:

  1. Selling pushes the market price down.
  2. Lower prices make bonding more attractive (better premiums).
  3. New bonders deposit assets, growing the treasury.
  4. The reserve floor rises, and staking yields improve.
  5. The protocol returns to equilibrium at a higher fundamental value.

This cycle means that short-term selling by some participants actually creates opportunity for others and can accelerate treasury growth. The protocol turns defection into a net positive over time.

What's Next?#

See how these dynamics play out in market conditions through Arbitrage, or learn the mechanics of Bonding and Staking that make this game theory possible.